Sunspot number trends
Pro Research Analysisby 
Searched over 200M research papers
Long-Term Sunspot Number Trends (1700–2015)
Research analyzing sunspot numbers from 1700 to 2015 shows a gradual increase in sunspot activity from 1700 until about 1975, followed by a gradual decrease from 1975 to 2015. This pattern is evident in both adaptive trend analyses and reconstructions using advanced statistical methods. The data also reveal the presence of the Centennial Gleissberg Cycle, a roughly 90-year oscillation in sunspot numbers, which helps explain periods of low solar activity such as the Dalton Minimum, Gleissberg Minimum, and the recent low activity during solar cycle 24. However, the current decline in sunspot numbers is not as deep as the Maunder Minimum, and there is no strong evidence that a new grand minimum similar to the Maunder Minimum is underway 12.
The Gleissberg Cycle and Multi-Decadal Oscillations
Multiple studies confirm the existence of the Gleissberg cycle, a significant component of sunspot variability with a period of about 90 years. This cycle accounts for a notable portion of the variance in sunspot numbers and is a key feature in long-term solar activity. The Gleissberg cycle has shown clear oscillations over the past three centuries, with some small but systematic changes in its period and amplitude. The combination of a long-term increasing trend, the Gleissberg cycle, and the regular 10–11 year Schwabe cycle explains nearly half of the variance in sunspot numbers over these timescales .
Modern Grand Maximum and Recent Trends
Recent reconstructions using non-parametric calibration methods confirm that solar activity in the second half of the 20th century reached a "modern grand maximum," a period of unusually high sunspot numbers. However, these reconstructions also suggest that sunspot activity in the 18th and 19th centuries was moderate, lower than some earlier estimates. The new data series provide a robust and consistent view of sunspot group numbers since 1739, supporting the idea of a recent peak followed by a decline in solar activity 47.
Calibration, Data Quality, and Methodological Advances
Efforts to recalibrate and correct sunspot number series have addressed inconsistencies and biases, especially in the transition periods between different observing stations and methods. Modern statistical techniques, such as singular spectrum analysis and nonparametric monitoring, have improved the reliability of long-term sunspot records by identifying and correcting anomalies caused by observer changes or equipment issues. These corrections have led to a more uniform and accurate sunspot number series, especially for the period from 1945 to 2015 379.
Hemispheric Sunspot Number Trends and Asymmetry
Studies of hemispheric sunspot numbers from 1874 to 2020 reveal significant north–south asymmetries in solar activity. The two hemispheres can evolve somewhat independently, with phase shifts of up to 28 months between their activity peaks. Over solar cycles 12 to 24, the mean hemispheric asymmetry is about 16%, with no consistent pattern in which hemisphere dominates. These findings suggest that solar cycle prediction methods can be improved by considering hemispheric dynamics separately 610.
Sunspot Numbers and Solar Flux Correlation
There is a strong correlation between monthly mean sunspot numbers and solar radio flux (F10.7), with both indices showing similar long-term trends. Even during deep solar minima, some magnetic activity persists, as indicated by both sunspot numbers and solar flux measurements. This relationship allows for reliable modeling and extrapolation of solar activity trends .
Conclusion
Sunspot number trends over the past three centuries show a long-term increase until the late 20th century, followed by a recent decline. The Gleissberg cycle and the modern grand maximum are key features of this variability. Improved calibration and statistical methods have enhanced the accuracy of sunspot records, while hemispheric analyses reveal complex, asymmetric solar cycle behavior. Overall, the current decline in sunspot numbers does not indicate a return to a Maunder Minimum-like grand minimum, but rather a moderate reduction in solar activity compared to the recent peak.
Sources and full results
Most relevant research papers on this topic